Camera-Catalog.com | Wide Web Camera Catalog
 
 
 
 
 
 
Bookmark and Share
  Digital Cameras Manufacturers
Sony (164)Olympus (157)
Samsung (152)Canon (142)
Fujifilm (129)Panasonic (117)
Nikon (112)Kodak (110)
Casio (89)Pentax (86)
Praktica (74)BenQ (65)
Rekam (60)UFO (47)
HP (43)Genius (34)
Ricoh (33)Ergo (33)
Premier (29)General Electric (22)
Sanyo (22)Rovershot (16)
Agfaphoto (14)Leica (12)
Polaroid (11)Minolta (11)
Hasselblad (11)Minox (9)
Sigma (9)Mercury (8)
  Lenses Manufacturers
Sigma (144)Canon (81)
Nikon (73)Sony (38)
Pentax (38)Zeiss (33)
Leica (27)Tokina (24)
Olympus (22)Tamron (19)
Panasonic (5)
Site Search:
  Users' Reviews
Samsung Digimax S1000
MikeRating: 1 out of 5 stars
Only got it for 2 weeks shot 6-7 test photo's with it. Then i checked out some setting and stuff and suddenly it died. I hope it's only mine that did ..
Samsung ES60
Andro FaderangaRating: 4 out of 5 stars
Bought this with a cheaper price in online shop..very handy and it has a lot of features for its price!definitel y..the best buy i had this year!!good ..
Nikon Coolpix P100
othmanRating: 5 out of 5 stars
very good
Samsung ES60
BethRating: 4 out of 5 stars
A really good camera for a cheap price! Lovely colours, great zoom, clear pictures, different modes and settings
Pentax Optio L50
RonRating: 3 out of 5 stars
A bit simple and basic but a good camera to use when traveling. It is light weight and can fit easily into your pocket.
Samsung NX5
RickRating: 5 out of 5 stars
this is nice camera but did not post Samsung SL605 Please post this as soon as possible i want to see its full specification
  Popular Comparisons
Canon PowerShot A3150 IS vs Nikon Coolpix L5
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ10 vs Canon PowerShot SX210 IS
Pentax Optio L70 vs Samsung Digimax A50
Canon EOS 550D (Rebel T2i) vs Canon EOS 450D (Rebel XSi)
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ8 vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5V
Olympus SP-800UZ vs Nikon Coolpix P100
Canon PowerShot A490 vs Samsung PL10

Kodak C713 Digital Camera

Kodak C713 Digital Camera
Owners Rating: 2.5
Rating: 2.5 out of 5 stars
 
BASIC SPECIFICATIONS
Manufacturer
Kodak [ View All Kodak Digital Cameras ]
ModelC713
Camera TypeCompact
Dimensions3.57 x 2.43 x 0.98 in (91 x 62 x 25 mm)
Weight4.8 oz (137 gramms)
WaterproofNo
SENSOR
Total Pixels7.3 Megapixels
Effective Sensor Resolution7 Megapixels
Sensor Size1/2.5 inch
Optical Sensor TypeCCD
Light Sensitivity80 - 1250 ISO, Auto ISO
Max Resolution3158 x 2344
FEATURES
Image StabilizerDigital
Digital Zoom5x
Video RecordingYes
Manual setting of shutter speed and apertureNo
FeaturesTripod mount
White BalanceAuto, Presets
Max Shutter Speed1/2 s
Min Shutter Speed1/4000 s
Auto Exposure Bracketing1/2 range in 2 EV steps
Exposure Metering3D Color Matrix
Digital Video FormatMOV
Digital Video CodecMJPEG
Built-in MicrophoneYes
Focal Length Equivalent to 35mm Camera36 - 108 mm
Macro ShootingYes
Minimal Focus Range0.13 m
LENS SYSTEM
Optical Zoom3x
Lens Aperture RangeF2.7 - F4.8
Lens ManufacturerKODAK
Image Aspect Ratio4:3, 3:2, 16:9
Video Max Resolution640x480
CAMERA FLASH
Built-in FlashYes
Flash Guide Number3.60 (m / ISO 100)
Red Eye ReductionYes
VIEWFINDER
ViewfinderNone
DISPLAY
Display Form FactorBuilt-in
Display Pixels115000
Display Size2.4 inch
STORAGE
Supported Flash MemorySD
Built-in Memory11 Mb
BATTERY
AA Battery ComparatibleYes
AA Battery Count2
Power SlotYes
ADDITIONALS FEATURES
Self TimerYes
Self Timer Delay2, 10 s
Image Stabilizer in Video ModeYes
Cables IncludedUSB cable
Included AccessoriesHand strap
InterfacesUSB (2.0)
OWNERS' REVIEWS
tar
August 10, 2009
Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
this one is fine with pictures but very poor at videos. when there was an event at our school, everyone was waiting for the dance competition. when the dancers came out, everyone showed out yheir cameras. i too wanted to take a video of the dance but when i started recording it....its very dark. i can almost see nothing eventhough the stage is full of lights. when i checked out others cam...theirs' were able to have clear videos. i felt sad coz i havent able to have a clear video.
Problems: dark and dull videos
Chris
December 26, 2008
Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
I love this camera ! Got it for Xmas this year (2008) and it is awesome! My parents have the model before mine, and is basically the same camera.. anyways, this is an AWESOME camera that you have to own
Problems: No problems
Nathaly
July 04, 2008
Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
VeEry good camera for the price, don't expect to get 2 000 $ pictures with a camera under 100 $, we have been using Kodak Easyshare cameras for work for a long time, ever since the first one, they are reliable affordable and take good pictures. one comment for all that rate this camera less than 5 is read the manual.
tyl
June 02, 2008
Rating: 0.5 out of 5 stars
i would rated it with "zero" if i could! i made a test indoor between this shity kodak and my cellphone (Sony ericsson k800i) wich has integrated an 3.2 Mp sony cybershot camera. Downloaded the pictures into my computer and zoomed them in parallel on my lcd. Surprize...the quality was almost the same! I think kodak made a very bad image processor, or CCD, ore something...cause is strange that the picture made with kodak 7Mp (3056*2292) had 459KB and the cellphone 3.2Mp (2048*3056) had 828KB. Anyway..i was testing also Sony DSC W55, huge difference. I will return it tomorow and probably buy sony dsc s730 wich is 125$. sorry for my bad english.
Elvis
February 21, 2008
Rating: 0.5 out of 5 stars
I agree with Rob, it is the best camera you can buy. This is one of the few cameras out there that actually alow you to think and take a picture the way you want to. For those that have bad results it isn't the Cameras fault that your a fucking idiot.................................... If you cant take a perfect picture with this camera then you a lazy fucking slob and need to learn about flash, ISO, and other things. Don't bitch because your lazy and fucking stupid, instead go get a little kid camera that requires no thinking at all. I saw a Barbi camera that would be perfect for you dumb fucks, it sells for $9.99 at K-mart.
avni
February 21, 2008
Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
ı've just bought this camera and ıt is satisfactory in my opinion. firstly its size is handy and comfortable one of the negatives is no visor just LCD and ı agree the deficiency of flash but not so bad. advantages there are so many options that provides suitable athmopsphere according to set for ex. snow, scene,child... this machine is great for this price but of course not the best u can buy better one if u give 400-500 dollars
Rob
February 11, 2008
Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
I just so happen to be a professional photographer who works for Adobe and thought for a joke I would try this inexpensive $89.00 Kodak camera out against some of the big boy cameras I own. Well, John is correct; the camera is a 5 star all the way. The people that are rating this camera under 5 stars first of all don’t know a thing about photography and secondly are probably working for the competition. All settings on this camera work perfectly just like they say they do. As far as shooting in day or night, the camera does a perfect job in both. The people that say it does not shoot well in low light are either not using the flash or they are out of flash range. That is a huge problem now days with people that give things low ratings, they don’t read the product specifications. The flash distance for all you morons giving this camera a bad rating is as follows: Wide angle: 2 – 11.8 feet @ ISO 200 Telephoto: 2 – 6.9 feet @ ISO 200 Anyway, great camera 5 star all the way.
Problems: None
shin
December 29, 2007
Rating: 0.5 out of 5 stars
I have to agree with everyone here. after putting the batteries in for the fist time the screen was black in white with lines in it. had to take them out and reload the batteries. the screen came on fine. this happen almost every time putting batteries in. the screen was horrible to look through. all the pictures came out bad. taking out the memory card was a pain i
Problems: after putting the batteries in for the fist time the screen was black in white with lines in it. this happen almost every time putting batteries in.
Tank R
December 25, 2007
Rating: 0.5 out of 5 stars
piece of junk. I expected more from Kodak. Severe let down. Too "cartoony". not enough functions. horrible color translation. I agree with Tina, this camera should be recalled. shame on Kodak for letting it be sold under their name.
Problems: low light color translation was HORRIBLE. see for your self: http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b380/zombieregime/000_0003.jpg if i could give a lower rating i would
Rich
December 02, 2007
Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
Out of the box this camera does not take perfect pictures. If you take still pictures in a well lit area then you will have decent results. I bought this in an emergency situation when my other camera died during a 3 day sporting event. The price was right but the results from day 1 of using this camera were dismal. Day 2 and playing with lighting i was able to get some use-able shots. Almost all of my still shots were fine. The one plus was the video capture seems to work well for the cost of the camera. If you want a point and click out of the box do not buy this camera it will take a bit to get used to and to get decent pictures.
Problems: picture quality is tricky to get right. hi motion shots are impossible. but i expected that with the cost. not perfect but with work the camera is workable.
Tina de Groot
November 29, 2007
Rating: 0.5 out of 5 stars
Very disappointing No success at all no matter what I try. My old cx 7300 3.2 megabites has much better results. I think Kodak should recall every one of the C713 version and refund the money. The serial number of the camera is KCGHP73927643. Not sure where is was manufactured. I don't recognise any of the text on the outside of the box. Japanese? Chinese? Arabic?
Problems: Wavy outlines of horizontal and vertical lines. Just not clear. No definition. Dreadful colours I had waited a long time to upgrade to this camera.I am very disappointed. It retails at $249.00 New Zealand. A rip off!!
Krystal
November 27, 2007
Rating: 0.5 out of 5 stars
Horrible Camera! I waited as long as I could to stray away from my Kodak CX743 and I finally did when I found this on sale at Walmart. Got it home took pictures of my Daughters first birthday and regretted ever buying it. The pictures were very blurry on every setting I used. Guess I will just try to find another old Kodak.
Problems: Blurry Picture warning on every picture using every setting. (My two sisters bought the same camera and all of us ended up returning them)
John
November 22, 2007
Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
Very good camera for me!
Problems: No

COMPARISONS
Popular comparisons..
Olympus FE-220Praktica DCZ 10.1Canon PowerShot S1 IS
Kodak C813Olympus FE-330Kodak C613
Canon PowerShot S90Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S650Sanyo VPC-S500
Canon Digital IXUS 850 ISKodak C140Sony Cyber-shot DSC-N2
Kodak C913UFO DC-6320Kodak V1003
Shuffle compare with..
HP Photosmart R818Nikon Coolpix S6000UFO DS 7330
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LS80Praktica DPix 3300Genius G-Shot 501 V2
UFO DC 6348Samsung NV7 OPSOlympus FE-5000
Olympus Mju 760 DigitalCanon PowerShot A410Olympus Mju TOUGH-6020
Genius G-Shot P433Canon EOS D60Mercury CyberPix E680
Compare Kodak C713 With
<< Rekam iLook-700 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T2 >>

Search Queries: c713, camera digital kodak c173, kodak c713 rate, where is the serial number for the DSC W215, Kodak C713 specs, kodak c173, how to determine date of manufacture from kodak serial number, pricing of kodak easy share c13, where is serial number digital camera samsung ST60, HARGA LCD KODAK 713, kodak easyshare c731, kodak C73, kodak C73, kodak C73, kodak C73, kodak c190 manual español PDF, kodak c173 getting pictures, recall kodak c713, kodak c73 battery, kodakc731.
Popular Mistakes: C71, C7113, C7713, C7133, CC713, 713, C13, C173, C731, 7C13, C73.
Camera-Catalog.com © 2007-2010    Site Map  |  Privacy Policy